Early mobilisation after hip fracture surgery is associated with improved patient outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to determine if after hip fracture surgery (1) early mobilisation is associated with improved clinical outcomes, and if so (2) are benefits directly proportional to how soon after surgery the patient mobilises. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review was conducted using four databases to identify all studies that compared postoperative early mobilisation with delayed mobilisation, in patients after hip fracture surgery. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was employed for critical appraisal and evaluation of all studies that met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies, including 297,435 patients were identified, of which 235,275 patients were mobilised early and 62,160 were mobilised late. Six studies assessed 30-day mortality, of which two also investigated 30-day complication rates. Pooled meta-analysis demonstrated that there were significantly lower 30-day mortality rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.41, p < 0.001) and complication rates (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.36-0.51, p < 0.001) in patients mobilising early after hip fracture surgery. Five studies investigated length of stay (LOS) and meta-analysis revealed no difference between groups (mean difference -0.57 days, 95% CI -1.89-0.74, p = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Early mobilisation in hip fracture patients is associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality and complication rates compared to delayed mobilisation, but no difference in LOS. These findings illustrate that early mobilisation is associated with superior post operative outcomes. However, a direct casual effect remains to be demonstrated, and further work on the factors underlying delayed mobilisation is required.

Mobilisation during mechanical ventilation: A qualitative study exploring the practice of conscious patients, nurses and physiotherapists in intensive care unit.

AIM: To explore the practice of mobilisation of conscious and mechanically ventilated patients and the interaction between patients, nurses and physiotherapists. BACKGROUND: Long-term consequences of critical illness can be reduced by mobilisation starting in Intensive Care Units, but implementation in clinical practice is presently sparse. DESIGN: A qualitative study with a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach. METHODS: Participant observations in three Intensive Care Units involved twelve conscious mechanically ventilated patients, thirty-one nurses and four physiotherapists. Additionally seven semi-structured patient interviews, respectively at the ward and after discharge and two focus group interviews with healthcare professionals were conducted. The data analysis was inspired by Ricoeur's interpretation theory. The study adhered to the COREQ checklist. FINDINGS: Healthcare professionals performed a balance of support and guidance to promote mobilisation practice. The complexity of ICU mobilisation required a flexible mobility plan. Furthermore, interaction with feedback and humour was found to be 'a leverage' for patient's motivation to partake in mobilisation. The practice of mobilisation found patients striving to cope and healthcare professionals promoting a 'balanced standing by' and negotiating the flexible mobility plan to support mobilisation. CONCLUSION: The study revealed a need to clarify interprofessional communication to align expectations towards mobilisation of conscious and mechanically ventilated patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The study demonstrated the important role of healthcare professionals to perform a stepwise and 'balanced standing by' in adequately supporting and challenging the mobilisation of mechanically ventilated patients. Furthermore, a synergy can arise when nurses and physiotherapists use supplementary feedback and humour, and cooperate based on a flexible situation-specific mobility plan in intensive care.

The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the impact of duration of early mobilisation on survivors of critical illness. The hypothesis was that interventions lasting over 40 min, as per the German guideline, positively affect the functional status at ICU discharge. METHODS: Prospective single-centre cohort study conducted in two ICUs in Germany. In 684 critically ill patients surviving an ICU stay > 24 h, out-of-bed mobilisation of more than 40 min was evaluated. RESULTS: Daily mobilisation ≥ 40 min was identified as an independent predictor of an improved functional status upon ICU discharge. This effect on the primary outcome measure, change of Mobility-Barthel until ICU discharge, was observed in three different models for baseline patient characteristics (average treatment effect (ATE), all three models p < 0.001). When mobilisation parameters like level of mobilisation, were included in the analysis, the average treatment effect disappeared [ATE 1.0 (95% CI - 0.4 to 2.4), p = 0.16]. CONCLUSIONS: A mobilisation duration of more than 40 min positively impacts functional outcomes at ICU discharge. However, the maximum level achieved during ICU stay was the most crucial factor regarding adequate dosage, as higher duration did not show an additional benefit in patients with already high mobilisation levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective Registry of Mobilization-, Routine- and Outcome Data of Intensive Care Patients (MOBDB), NCT03666286. Registered 11 September 2018-retrospectively registered, https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT03666286 .

Effects of early mobilisation program on functional capacity, daily living activities, and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide in patients hospitalised for acute heart failure. A randomised controlled trial.

Background: Patients hospitalised for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) show reduced functional capacity, limited activities of daily living (ADL), and elevated N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). The management of these patients focuses mainly on medical therapy with little consideration for in-patient cardiac rehabilitation. There has been a growing interest in evaluating the efficacy of early mobilisation, as the core for in-hospital rehabilitation, in ADHF patients in the last decade; however, the randomised trials on this topic are few. Objective: This randomised-controlled study, therefore, aimed to further test the hypothesis that early supervised mobilisation would have beneficial effects on functional capacity, ADL, and NT-proBNP in stabilised patients following ADHF. Methods: This is a single-centered, randomised-controlled, parallel-group trial in which 30 patients hospitalised for ADHF were randomly assigned to two groups; the study group (age=55.4±5.46 years, n1=15) and the control group (age=55.73±5.61 years, n2=15). Inclusion criteria were ADHF on top of chronic heart failure independent of etiology or ejection fraction, clinical/hemodynamic stability, age from 40 to 60 years old, and both genders. Exclusion criteria were cardiogenic shock, acute coronary ischemia, or significant arrhythmia. Both groups received the usual medical care, but only the study group received an early structured mobilisation protocol within 3 days of hospital admission till discharge. The outcome measures were the 6-min walk distance (6-MWD) and the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) determined from the 6-min walk test at discharge, the Barthel index (BI), NT-proBNP, and the length of hospital stays (LOS). Results: The study group showed significantly greater improvements compared to the controls in the 6-MWD (252.28±92.32 versus 106.35±56.36 m, P<0.001), the RPE (12.53±0.91 versus 15.4±1.63, P<0.001), and the LOS (10.42±4.23 versus 16.85±6.87 days, p=0.009) at discharge. Also, the study group showed significant improvements in the BI compared to baseline [100 (100-100) versus 41.87 (35-55), p=0.009] and the controls [100 (100-100) versus 92.5(85-95), p=0.006]. The mean value of NT-proBNP showed a significant reduction only compared to baseline (786.28±269.5 versus 1069.03±528.87 pg/mL, p=0.04) following the intervention. The absolute mean change (Δ) of NT-proBNP showed an observed difference between groups in favor of the study group (i.e., Δ=↓282.75±494.13 pg/mL in the study group versus ↓26.42±222.21 pg/mL in the control group, p=0.077). Conclusion: Early structured mobilisation under the supervision of a physiotherapist could be strongly suggested in combination with the usual medical care to help improve the functional capacity and daily living activities, reduce NT-proBNP levels, and shorten the hospital stay in stabilised patients following ADHF. Trial registration number: PACTR202202476383975.

Early versus late weight-bearing in operatively treated ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Over the past 30 years, several studies have compared early weight-bearing versus late weight-bearing following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures; however, no review strictly including patients with ankle fractures and complete syndesmotic disruption has been performed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to compare early versus late weight-bearing following surgery for ankle fracture with syndesmotic injury regarding clinical and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was applied to the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed databases from their inception to the 17th of January 2022. The articles were screened independently by two blinded reviewers. Data were extracted by one author, then cross-checked and approved by the other. RESULTS: No comparative studies were found; therefore, studies describing either early or late weight-bearing were included. It was thus not possible to perform a meta-analysis. 11 studies and 751 patients were included. An early partial weight-bearing protocol was used in three studies (253 patients) and late in eight studies (498 patients). Functional outcomes suggested that there were no clear differences between early partial weight-bearing and late weight-bearing. The reoperation rate was 9-31% in the early group and 0-11% in the late. Similar results were seen for loss of syndesmotic reduction, malreduction, infection, and fixation failure. CONCLUSION: Pros and cons were reported for early partial weight-bearing and late weight-bearing, but the evidence was very limited as our results were based on noncomparative studies. In the future, high-quality comparative studies focusing on functional outcomes within 6 months postoperatively are needed. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: 1.

Getting the body back on track - Understanding the phenomenon of mobilisation when conscious and mechanically ventilated patients are mobilised in the intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To gain an in-depth understanding of the phenomenon of mobilisation when conscious and mechanically ventilated patients are mobilised in the intensive care unit. DESIGN: A qualitative study with a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach. Data were generated in three intensive care units from September 2019 to March 2020. Participant observations of twelve conscious mechanically ventilated patients, thirty-five nurses and four physiotherapists were performed. Furthermore, seven semi-structured patient interviews were conducted, both on the ward and after discharge. FINDINGS: Mobilisation during mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit followed a trajectory from a failing body to a growing sense of independence in getting the body back on track. Three themes were revealed: 'Challenging to move a failing body', 'Ambiguity of both resistance and willingness in the process of strengthen the body', and 'An ongoing effort in getting the body back on track'. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilisation when conscious and mechanically ventilated included support of the living body by physical prompts and ongoing bodily guidance. Resistance and willingness regarding mobilisation were found to be a way of coping with bodily reactions of comfort or discomfort, embedded in a need to feel bodily control. The trajectory of mobilisation promoted a sense of agency, as mobilisation activities at different stages during the intensive care unit stay supported the patients in becoming more active collaborators in getting the body back on track. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Ongoing bodily guidance provided by healthcare professionals can promote bodily control and support conscious and mechanically ventilated patients in active participation in mobilisation. Furthermore, understanding the ambiguity of patients' reactions caused by loss of bodily control provides a potential to prepare mechanically ventilated patients for and assist them with mobilisation. In particular, the first mobilisation in the intensive care unit seems to influence the success of future mobilisation, as the body remembers negative experiences.

Investigating the impact of physical activity interventions on delirium outcomes in intensive care unit patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: To investigate the impact of physical activity interventions, including early mobilisation, on delirium outcomes in critically ill patients. Methods: Electronic database literature searches were conducted, and studies were selected based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions quality assessment tools were utilised. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations was used to assess levels of evidence for delirium outcomes. The study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020210872). Results: Twelve studies were included; ten randomised controlled trials one observational case-matched study and one before-after quality improvement study. Only five of the included randomised controlled trial studies were judged to be at low risk of bias, with all others, including both non-randomised controlled trials deemed to be at high or moderate risk. The pooled relative risk for incidence was 0.85 (0.62-1.17) which was not statistically significant in favour of physical activity interventions. Narrative synthesis for effect on duration of delirium found favour towards physical activity interventions reducing delirium duration with median differences ranging from 0 to 2 days in three comparative studies. Studies comparing varying intervention intensities showed positive outcomes in favour of greater intensity. Overall levels of evidence were low quality. Conclusions: Currently there is insufficient evidence to recommend physical activity as a stand-alone intervention to reduce delirium in Intensive Care Units. Physical activity intervention intensity may impact on delirium outcomes, but a lack of high-quality studies limits the current evidence base.

Healthcare professionals perspectives on feasibility and acceptability of family engagement in early mobilisation for adult critically ill patients: A descriptive qualitative study.

AIMS: To explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of family engagement in early mobilisation for adult critically ill patients. BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation is beneficial to minimise intensive care unit acquired-weakness in critically ill patients and family engagement can help with meeting early mobilisation goals, but it is not widely practiced. Understanding healthcare professionals' perceptions of feasibility and acceptability of family engagement in early mobilisation of adult critically ill patients is required to inform future implementation strategies to promote early mobilisation. DESIGN: A descriptive qualitative study. METHODS: Face-to-face, individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted between August 2021 and March 2022 with healthcare professionals working in two intensive care units in Australia. The interviews were analysed using the inductive content analysis, and descriptive statistics were used to summarise participant characteristics. The COREQ checklist was followed when reporting this study. RESULTS: Eleven ICU nurses, five physiotherapists and four physicians participated in the interviews. Three main categories were identified: (i) healthcare professionals' readiness, (ii) mediators of engagement and (iii) foundations for successful implementation. Most participants demonstrated a positive attitude towards an implementation of family engagement in early mobilisation for adult critically ill patients; however, capability and capacity of healthcare professionals, family members' willingness, availability and readiness and the care context were considered factors that could influence the successful implementation. CONCLUSION: From the perspectives of healthcare professionals, family engagement in early mobilisation is feasible and acceptable to enact but implementation is influenced by contextual factors including, healthcare professionals' capability and capacity and family members' willingness, availability and readiness. Collaborative teamwork and preparing family members and healthcare professionals are needed to support this practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings provide important information to further identify potential strategies of family engagement in early mobilisation and to help and mitigate factors that impede implementation.

Early mobilisation practice in intensive care units: A large-scale cross-sectional survey in China.

BACKGROUND: The field of early rehabilitation has developed slowly in mainland China and there are limited data on the implementation of early mobilisation (EM) practice in intensive care unit (ICUs) in China. AIMS: To investigate the implementation of EM in ICUs in mainland China and to analyse its influencing factors. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional electronic survey was conducted in 444 ICUs across 11 provinces in China. Head nurses provided data on institutional characteristics and EM practice in ICUs. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with the implementation of EM. RESULTS: In all, 56.98% (253/444) of ICUs implemented EM with comprehensive or complete implementation in 86 ICUs. Of the 191 ICUs that did not use EM, 136 planned to implement EM in the near future. Of the 253 ICUs that used EM, 21.34% of ICUs implemented EM for all eligible patients, while 24.90% would evaluate and carry out EM within 48 h after ICU admission, 39.13% had collaborative EM teams, 34.39% reported the use of EM protocols, 14.63% reported multidisciplinary rounds and 17.39% had medical orders and charging standards for all EM activities. Only 18.18% of ICUs conducted frequent professional training for EM, and abnormal events occurred in 15.41% of ICUs during EM practice. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an economically strong province, the presence of a dedicated therapist team, more ICU beds and a higher staff-to-bed ratio favoured the implementation of EM. Furthermore, multidisciplinary rounds, well-established medical orders and charging standards, and a high frequency of professional training can lead to the comprehensive promotion and development of EM practice in ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: Both the implementation rate and quality of EM practice for critically ill patients require improvement. EM practice in Chinese ICUs is still nascent and requires development in a variety of domains. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: To facilitate the implementation of EM in ICUs, more human resources, especially the involvement of a professional therapist team, should be deployed. In addition, health providers should actively organize multidisciplinary rounds and professional training and formulate appropriate EM medical orders and charging standards.

Daily variation in physical activity during mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation of mechanically ventilated patients during their stay at an intensive care unit (ICU) can improve physical recovery. Yet, an objective and specified description of physical activities while in the ICU is lacking. Therefore, our aim was to describe the objectively assessed type, quantity, and daily variation of physical activity among mechanically ventilated patients while in the ICU. METHOD: In an observational study in two mixed medical/surgical ICUs, we measured body posture in 39 patients on mechanical ventilation using a thigh- and chest-worn accelerometer while in the ICU. The accelerometer describes time spent lying, sitting, moving, in-bed cycling, standing and walking. Descriptive analysis of physical activity and daily variation was done using STATA. RESULTS: We found that mechanically ventilated patients spend 20/24 h lying in bed, 3 h sitting and only 1 h standing, moving, walking or bicycling while in the ICU. Intervals of non-lying time appeared from 9.00 to 12.00 and again from 18.00 to 21.30, with peaks at the hours of 9.00 and 18.00. CONCLUSION: ICU patients on mechanical ventilation were primarily sedentary. Physical activity of mechanically ventilated patients seems to be related to nurse- and/or physiotherapy-initiated activities. There is a need to create an awareness of improving clinical routines, towards active mobilisation throughout the day, for this vulnerable patient population during their stay in the ICU.

The effects of combined early oral health care and early mobilisation on the incidence of stroke-associated pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of combined early oral healthcare and early mobilisation on the incidence of stroke-associated pneumonia during hospitalisation of acute stroke patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-centre, non-blinded, before-and-after cohort study, patients received basic stroke rehabilitation by a multidisciplinary team within 72 h of symptom onset from July to September 2016 and from July to September 2018. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) patients who received combined early oral healthcare and early mobilisation (early intervention group) (n=107), and 2) patients who received usual care (control group) (n=107). The relationship between the stroke-associated pneumonia incidence and prognosis was examined. RESULTS: The early intervention group had a significantly lower incidence of stroke-associated pneumonia than the control group (0.93% vs. 7.48%; P=0.01). Moreover, the early intervention group had a significantly lower proportion of patients who died or required medical care because of recurrent pneumonia at discharge (0.93% vs. 5.6%; P=0.04). In contrast, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the Revised Hasegawa's Dementia Scale on day 14 (22.5 vs. 23; P=0.87), Functional Independence Measure on day 14 (112 vs. 116; P=0.06), and rate of total oral diet (Food Intake LEVEL Scale ≥7) at discharge (95.2% vs. 93.5%; P=0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Combined early oral healthcare and early mobilisation by a multidisciplinary team significantly decreased the stroke-associated pneumonia incidence within 7 days and reduced the percentage of patients who died or required medical care because of recurrent pneumonia after stroke.

Barriers and perceived benefits of early mobilisation programmes in Dutch paediatric intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation of critically ill adults has been proven effective and is safe and feasible for critically ill children. However, barriers and perceived benefits of paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff involvement in mobilising critically ill children are largely unknown. AIM: To explore the barriers and perceived benefits regarding early mobilisation of critically ill children as perceived by PICU staff. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey study among staff from seven PICUs in the Netherlands has been carried out. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifteen of the 641 health care professionals (33.5%) who were invited to complete a questionnaire responded, of whom 159 (75%) were nurses, 40 (19%) physicians, and 14 (6%) physical therapists. Respondents considered early mobilisation potentially beneficial to shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation (86%), improve wake/sleep rhythm (86%) and shorten the length of stay in the PICU (85%). However, staff were reluctant to mobilise patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (63%), and patients with traumatic brain injury (49%). Perceived barriers to early mobilisation were hemodynamic instability (78%), risk of dislocation of lines/tubes (74%), and level of sedation (62%). In total, 40.3% of PICU nurses stated that physical therapists provided enough support in their PICU, but 84.6% of the physical therapists believed support was sufficient. CONCLUSION: Participating PICU staff considered early mobilisation as potentially beneficial in improving patient outcomes, although barriers were noted in certain patient groups. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: We identified barriers to early mobilisation which should be addressed in implementation research projects in order to make early mobilisation in critically ill children work.

Quality improvement intervention to stimulate early mobilisation of critically ill children.

BACKGROUND: Immobility during hospital stay is associated with muscle weakness, delirium, and delayed neurocognitive recovery. Early mobilisation of critically ill adults improves their physical functioning and shortens the duration of mechanical ventilation. However, comparable research in children is lacking. AIMS: To determine the effects of the implementation of an early mobilisation (EM) program on mobility activities for critically ill children and to explore barriers and facilitators and clinical outcomes before and after implementation. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single-centre before-and-after study. This study was conducted in a PICU of a large tertiary hospital. Children aged from 3 months to 18 years, with an expected stay of ≥3 days were eligible to participate. In the "before" phase, participants received usual care; in the "after" phase we implemented a multicomponent, multidisciplinary EM protocol. The primary outcome was a change in the process outcome "mobilisation activities". Secondary outcomes were PICU staff opinions on mobilisation (survey), safety, process measures, involvement of parents and physical therapist, and clinical outcomes (sedative use and prevalence of delirium). RESULTS: A total of 113 children were included; 55 before and 58 after, with a median age of 31 months (IQR: 10-103) and 35 months (IQR: 7-152), respectively. The number of mobilisation activities (per patient per day) had significantly increased from 5 (IQR: 2-7) to 6 (IQR: 4-8) (U = 272185.0; p < .001). PT consultations for mobilisation had significantly increased from 23.6% (13/55) to 46.5% (27/58) (X2  = 6.48; p = .011). In both phases, no mobilisation-related adverse events were documented. The survey showed that PICU staff found EM of critically ill children useful and feasible. In the after phase, PICU staff rated the perceived benefit of the support of the physical therapist during mobilisation activities significantly higher than in the before phase (X2  = 34.80; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a structured EM program for critically ill children is feasible and safe. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: It is suggested to start the implementation of a structed EM program with the idendentification of local barriers and facilitators by an interdisciplinary PICU team. Further, an increased presence of physiotherapists on the PICU would improve mobilisation levels, and facilitate mobilisation in critically ill children. Also, they can support and advice PICU nurses and parents in mobilising children.

Early mobilisation in critically ill children: Does routine patient screening reduce time to commencing mobilisation?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of daily screening for medical readiness to participate in early mobilisation in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), on reducing time to mobilisation and to explore the safety-, feasibility-, and patient-level barriers to the practice. METHODS: An interventional study with a historical control group was conducted in a PICU in a tertiary teaching hospital in Australia. The Early Mobilisation Screening Checklist was applied at 24-48 h of PICU stay with the aim to reduce time to commencing mobilisation. All patients aged term to 18 years admitted to the PICU for >48 h were included in this study. Data on time to mobilisation and patient characteristics were collected by an unblinded case note audit of children admitted to the PICU over 5 months in 2018 for the baseline group and over a corresponding period in 2019 for the intervention group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 71 children were enrolled. Survival analysis was used to compare time to mobilisation between groups, and a cox regression model found that children in the intervention group were 1.26 times more likely to participate in mobility, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.391, log rank test for equality of survival functions). Early mobilisation was safe, with no adverse events reported in 177 participant mobilisation days. Feasibility was demonstrated by 62% of participants mobilising within 72 h of admission. Mechanical ventilation during stay (P = 0.043) and days receiving sedation infusion (% of days) (P = 0.042) were associated with a decreased likelihood of participating in mobility. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of routine screening alone does not significantly reduce time to commencing mobility in the PICU. Early mobilisation in the PICU is safe and feasible and resulted in no adverse events during mobilisation. Patient characteristics influencing participation in mobility warrant further exploration.

Early mobilisation after pain relief for conservative management for intertrochanteric fractures: a pandemic enforced innovation and its results.

BACKGROUND: The COVID pandemic challenged the orthopaedic mind on several fronts. 1 of them was in the management of intertrochanteric fractures. A subset of these patients refused surgical intervention during the pandemic for related reasons. Faced with the goal of early verticalisation, the senior author used pain relief as a method to facilitate early mobilisation in 23 patients with peritrochanteric fractures. METHODS: 23 patients with stable intertrochanteric fractures received a ß 6 distal sodium channel block (DSCB) and were allowed to walk from day 1 without surgery, traction or spica. The goal was to prevent complications of recumbency in this subset of patients. The basic idea of immediate mobilisation from the time of fracture was based on Sarmiento's sausage theory. RESULTS: All the fractures united. There were no major complications. No shortening was seen in more than 50% cases and the shortening did not exceed 2 cm in any case. All patients were satisfied with the outcome and had good to excellent Harris Hip Scores. CONCLUSIONS: The block and walk method is a surprisingly satisfactory method of treatment for stable intertrochanteric fractures. It circumvents the risks of surgery whilst allowing immediate mobilisation preventing complications associated with the other modalities of fracture management.

Mobilisation of critically ill patients receiving norepinephrine: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Mobilisation and exercise intervention in general are safe and feasible in critically ill patients. For patients requiring catecholamines, however, doses of norepinephrine safe for mobilisation in the intensive care unit (ICU) are not defined. This study aimed to describe mobilisation practice in our hospital and identify doses of norepinephrine that allowed a safe mobilisation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study of 16 ICUs at a university hospital in Germany with patients admitted between March 2018 and November 2021. Data were collected from our patient data management system. We analysed the effect of norepinephrine on level (ICU Mobility Scale) and frequency (units per day) of mobilisation, early mobilisation (within 72 h of ICU admission), mortality, and rate of adverse events. Data were extracted from free-text mobilisation entries using supervised machine learning (support vector machine). Statistical analyses were done using (generalised) linear (mixed-effect) models, as well as chi-square tests and ANOVAs. RESULTS: A total of 12,462 patients were analysed in this study. They received a total of 59,415 mobilisation units. Of these patients, 842 (6.8%) received mobilisation under continuous norepinephrine administration. Norepinephrine administration was negatively associated with the frequency of mobilisation (adjusted difference -0.07 mobilisations per day; 95% CI - 0.09, - 0.05; p ≤ 0.001) and early mobilisation (adjusted OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76, 0.90; p ≤ 0.001), while a higher norepinephrine dose corresponded to a lower chance to be mobilised out-of-bed (adjusted OR 0.01; 95% CI 0.00, 0.04; p ≤ 0.001). Mobilisation with norepinephrine did not significantly affect mortality (p > 0.1). Higher compared to lower doses of norepinephrine did not lead to a significant increase in adverse events in our practice (p > 0.1). We identified that mobilisation was safe with up to 0.20 µg/kg/min norepinephrine for out-of-bed (IMS ≥ 2) and 0.33 µg/kg/min for in-bed (IMS 0-1) mobilisation. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilisation with norepinephrine can be done safely when considering the status of the patient and safety guidelines. We demonstrated that safe mobilisation was possible with norepinephrine doses up to 0.20 µg/kg/min for out-of-bed (IMS ≥ 2) and 0.33 µg/kg/min for in-bed (IMS 0-1) mobilisation.

Early rehabilitation and mobilisation of neonatal and paediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: A UK and Ireland consensus document.

Despite increasing early rehabilitation and mobilisation (ERM) in paediatric intensive care, current evidence for ERM of neonatal and paediatric patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is limited. The proposed benefits of ERM in neonatal and paediatric ECMO patients are multifaceted, including reduced immobility related issues and maintenance of functional ability. However, ECMO presents additional safety and logistical challenges, and currently there are no published neonatal or paediatric guidelines. A consensus document was developed to provide guidance for ERM with neonatal and paediatric ECMO patients. The document was developed by specialist physiotherapists from nine ECMO centres within the UK and Ireland, together with the UK Paediatric Critical Care Society ECMO group and members of the multidisciplinary team. The document covers key considerations and practicalities for completing ERM in this population including, acuity level measurement, activity level guidance, safety and risk assessment, and goal setting. Risk assessment and safety checklist bedside tools are also included and designed to be adapted as required to meet specific unit policies and protocols.

Same-day discharge after early mobilisation and increased frequency of physiotherapy following hip and knee arthroplasty.

Background: Advanced rehabilitation pathway (ARP) after hip and knee arthroplasties is popular globally and is gaining ground in South Africa (SA). A multidisciplinary team in Rustenburg, SA, has implemented an ARP with the first same-day discharge (SDD) from hospital. The lack of evidence of physiotherapy protocols within an ARP determined our study. Objectives: Determine and compare hospital length of stay (LOS) (hours), patient satisfaction (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)), patient safety (30-day re-admission) and cost between the two cohorts. Method: A quantitative prospective patient (treatment) group receiving early mobilisation with increased frequency of physiotherapy on post-operative day zero (POD0) was compared to a conservatively managed retrospective historical (control) group following post-operative elective hip and knee arthroplasties. Results: Results for the prospective group which were significantly improved relative to the retrospective group included decreased LOS (median 7.650, p < 0.001), less pain at 6 weeks (mean 16.20, standard deviation [SD] = 2.673, p < 0.001), less stiffness (mean 5.82, SD = 1.214, p = 0.007), higher function (mean 54.87, SD = 8.544, p < 0.001), lower hospital cost (mean R43 340, p < 0.001) and physiotherapy cost (mean R1069, p < 0.001), and total costs compared to the retrospective group (mean R117 062, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Safe and cost-effective SDD is possible in an ARP with earlier mobilisation and increased frequency of physiotherapy on POD0. Clinical implications: Achieving safe SDD after hip and knee arthroplasty surgeries saved costs and improved patient satisfaction, with a decrease in LOS being beneficial for medical funders and stakeholders including government aiming to implement National Health Insurance (NHI) in the future.

The effects of abdominal-based early progressive mobilisation on gastric motility in endotracheally intubated intensive care patients: A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether an abdominal-based early progressive mobilisation program improves gastric motility and reduces feeding intolerance in critically ill patients with endotracheal intubation. DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was designed. Adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit who were intubated and had an order for enteral nutrition were randomly assigned to partake in an three stages of abdominal-based progressive mobilisation program (passive abdominal massage, bed-side bicycle and ambulating) or standard of care. Gastric antral motility was measured by bedside ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 83 critically ill patients were included in the study. The intervention group displayed a statistically significant improvement in the antral motility index than the control group (p < .001), as well as in complications of feeding intolerance, including the incidence of abdominal distention (9.8% vs 33.3%, p = .009), vomiting (0% vs 16.7%, p = .019) and diarrhoea (22% vs 50%, p = .008). However, no significant difference for the full enteral feeding rate on the third day was observed between the groups.Furthermore, time on mechanical ventilation (4.52 ± 2.77 days vs 6.24 ± 3.90 days, p = .023) was shorter in intervention group, but no significant difference of length of intensive care unit stay was observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an abdominal-based early progressive mobilisation program can improve gastric motility and feeding intolerance in critically ill patients with an endotracheal tube.